Difference between revisions of "MainPage:Nuclear:KaonDetector:Paper1"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
{|border="1" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0" style="background-color:lightgray" | {|border="1" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0" style="background-color:lightgray" | ||
− | | <font size="2"> | + | | <font size="2">[[MainPage:Nuclear|⇐ Back to the Main_Page]]</font> |
|} | |} | ||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
* Introduction to physics and infrastructure, i.e., spectrometers in Hall C | * Introduction to physics and infrastructure, i.e., spectrometers in Hall C | ||
<font color="green"> | <font color="green"> | ||
− | * | + | * Cite other experiments (approved) that also require the detector? |
</font> | </font> | ||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
** choice of aerogel radiators | ** choice of aerogel radiators | ||
** impact on other detectors, e.g., delta electrons | ** impact on other detectors, e.g., delta electrons | ||
+ | <font color="green"> | ||
+ | ** impact on other detectors: multiple scattering calculation | ||
+ | </font> | ||
=== CONSTRUCTION AND COUNTER LAYOUT === | === CONSTRUCTION AND COUNTER LAYOUT === | ||
Line 42: | Line 45: | ||
=== PHOTOMULTIPLIER TUBES STUDIES === | === PHOTOMULTIPLIER TUBES STUDIES === | ||
* Measurements of quantum efficiency and photocathode uniformity | * Measurements of quantum efficiency and photocathode uniformity | ||
+ | <font color="green"> | ||
+ | -> Do we have Q.E. measurements? Was HMS PMT measured for Q.E.? | ||
+ | </font> | ||
=== MC SIMULATIONS === | === MC SIMULATIONS === | ||
Line 53: | Line 59: | ||
=== PERFORMANCE === | === PERFORMANCE === | ||
* Results from cosmic measurements | * Results from cosmic measurements | ||
+ | <font color="green"> | ||
+ | ** signal from 1.030 and 1.015 aerogel, single column(?) | ||
+ | ** 1.030 to 1.015 signal ratio, for single column of aerogel (can add calculation, prototype and MC ratios for comparison?) | ||
+ | </font> | ||
=== SUMMARY AND OUTLOOK === | === SUMMARY AND OUTLOOK === | ||
Line 58: | Line 68: | ||
* Possibility of improvements: | * Possibility of improvements: | ||
** additional tray with even lower refractive index (when material becomes available) | ** additional tray with even lower refractive index (when material becomes available) | ||
+ | * Installation and tests with beam to come | ||
</font> | </font> |
Revision as of 17:08, 8 July 2013
⇐ Back to the Main_Page |
First outline from dr. Horn, on 07/07/2013.
In green are comments from Marco, on 07/08/2013.
Paper Outline: KAON AEROGEL CERENKOV DETECTOR
INTRODUCTION
- Introduction to physics and infrastructure, i.e., spectrometers in Hall C
- Cite other experiments (approved) that also require the detector?
DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS
- Experiment requirements and motivation for aerogel detector
- Design choices
- threshold vs. RICH
- box dimensions and PMT placement etc.
- choice of aerogel radiators
- impact on other detectors, e.g., delta electrons
- impact on other detectors: multiple scattering calculation
CONSTRUCTION AND COUNTER LAYOUT
- Details of the detector box and tray construction
- Motivation and explanation of materials used in the construction, i.e., aluminum, honeycomb, etc.
- Details on the fabrication and construction
- Construction of a frame to hold aerogel in center of box for cases where box not entirely filled
- Short description of detector components
- Choice of reflective materials, wires to hold aerogel, etc.
- Aerogel used, i.e., manufacturer
- PMTs (geometry, properties, details on their installation in detector, i.e., magnetic shielding, aluminum cylinders etc.)
- Construction of a single counter (Prototype) and tests performed with it
AEROGEL STUDIES
- Characterization of aerogel tiles
- Variation of dimensions and refractive index tile-to-tile and batch-to-batch
- Optical measurements (transmittance etc.)
- Photon Yield
PHOTOMULTIPLIER TUBES STUDIES
- Measurements of quantum efficiency and photocathode uniformity
-> Do we have Q.E. measurements? Was HMS PMT measured for Q.E.?
MC SIMULATIONS
- Description of the simulation(s) performed, e.g.,
- predictions of photoelectron signal
- uniformity of signal
- average number of PMTs that trigger per event
- timing resolution of detector
- Light collection efficiency
PERFORMANCE
- Results from cosmic measurements
- signal from 1.030 and 1.015 aerogel, single column(?)
- 1.030 to 1.015 signal ratio, for single column of aerogel (can add calculation, prototype and MC ratios for comparison?)
SUMMARY AND OUTLOOK
- Possibility of improvements:
- additional tray with even lower refractive index (when material becomes available)
- Installation and tests with beam to come