Difference between revisions of "General MWG Meeting Summary 3/16/20"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
* Much work has been done on addressing action items from 2/25 meeting (see [http://www.vsl.cua.edu/cua_phy/index.php?title=General_MWG_Meeting_Summary_3/16/20&action=edit Richard's summary slides]) | * Much work has been done on addressing action items from 2/25 meeting (see [http://www.vsl.cua.edu/cua_phy/index.php?title=General_MWG_Meeting_Summary_3/16/20&action=edit Richard's summary slides]) | ||
− | + | :* mesonMC works in Geant4 | |
− | + | :* mesonMC now includes neutron and Lambda final states | |
− | + | :* crossing angles checked and updated | |
− | + | :* y-cut (0.01,095) has been applied | |
− | + | :* statistical uncertainty table has been checked and updated | |
− | + | :* mesonMC script for large number of bins has been generated | |
* Found that run into problems when running/transferring large files within the global EIC software framework - fixed by making a new version that allows to run the analysis more centrally | * Found that run into problems when running/transferring large files within the global EIC software framework - fixed by making a new version that allows to run the analysis more centrally | ||
* Detection fractions | * Detection fractions | ||
− | + | :* for proton almost 100% | |
− | + | :* for neutron: have the data, but still need to analyze | |
− | + | :* for K/Lambda: seems that not all Lambdas decay properly - note that if it doesn't decay it will seem to have a good detection fraction since close to proton in mass. Also, the fraction of Lambdas that doesn't decay would likely be misidentified as (heavy) neutrons. | |
* Virtual planes are ready - working on analysis chain with reconstruction for K-Lambda, also need to understand decay for this | * Virtual planes are ready - working on analysis chain with reconstruction for K-Lambda, also need to understand decay for this | ||
* Discussion of [http://www.vsl.cua.edu/cua_phy/index.php?title=General_MWG_Meeting_Summary_3/16/20&action=edit Richard's Meson SF slides] for the EIC Yellow Report 1st Workshop (https://indico.bnl.gov/event/7449/timetable/#20200319) | * Discussion of [http://www.vsl.cua.edu/cua_phy/index.php?title=General_MWG_Meeting_Summary_3/16/20&action=edit Richard's Meson SF slides] for the EIC Yellow Report 1st Workshop (https://indico.bnl.gov/event/7449/timetable/#20200319) | ||
− | + | :* Overall Comments for Structure: | |
− | + | ::* Take 1-2 examples from the EPJA paper, e.g. pion SF and pion FF and explain implications for detectors, e.g. need detection fraction, which affects forward detector design, and need calorimetry for large-x resolution | |
− | + | ::* Show kinematics for scattered electron, e.g. momentum/angular distribution and point out ongoing work on plugins for simulation, i.e. demonstrate how the analysis chain works | |
− | + | ::* Include a timeline of meetings that took place and that are planned for the next months | |
− | + | :* Specific comments: | |
− | + | ::* Split the neutron and Lambda final states into two slides - different detector requirements for each, KLambda is new for many people | |
− | ::* | + | ::* Beam energies: general concept is to take fixed luminosity and look what is doable at the extremes |
+ | ::* make clear that pi0 is not for meson SF studies but for systematic checks | ||
+ | ::* Note that for KLambda need to ''reconstruct'' the particle | ||
+ | ::* Include slide on Jupyter details in backup for reference | ||
+ | ::* Adjust crossing angle in the DEMP studies - make new plots | ||
− | ''' | + | '''ACTION ITEMS''' |
− | NEXT WORKING MEETING: MONDAY APRIL 13 (all day, remote meeting)''' | + | * Complete the slides for the EIC meeting and circulate |
+ | |||
+ | * Ask for a 5-min presentation on meson SF in the joint PWG+DWG session | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Figure out detection fraction for KLambda | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Continue work on analysis chain including KLambda | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Is there a meeting time that allows people from more time zones to participate? | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | '''NEXT MEETING: MONDAY MARCH 30 at 4:00PM (ET)''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''NEXT WORKING MEETING: MONDAY APRIL 13 (all day, remote meeting)''' |
Latest revision as of 10:38, 18 March 2020
PARTICIPANTS
All remote: D. Romanov, G. Huber, J. Arrington, T. Federico, R. Ent, R. Trotta, Y. Furletova, H-W. Lin, S. Kay
SUMMARY NOTES
- Much work has been done on addressing action items from 2/25 meeting (see Richard's summary slides)
- mesonMC works in Geant4
- mesonMC now includes neutron and Lambda final states
- crossing angles checked and updated
- y-cut (0.01,095) has been applied
- statistical uncertainty table has been checked and updated
- mesonMC script for large number of bins has been generated
- Found that run into problems when running/transferring large files within the global EIC software framework - fixed by making a new version that allows to run the analysis more centrally
- Detection fractions
- for proton almost 100%
- for neutron: have the data, but still need to analyze
- for K/Lambda: seems that not all Lambdas decay properly - note that if it doesn't decay it will seem to have a good detection fraction since close to proton in mass. Also, the fraction of Lambdas that doesn't decay would likely be misidentified as (heavy) neutrons.
- Virtual planes are ready - working on analysis chain with reconstruction for K-Lambda, also need to understand decay for this
- Discussion of Richard's Meson SF slides for the EIC Yellow Report 1st Workshop (https://indico.bnl.gov/event/7449/timetable/#20200319)
- Overall Comments for Structure:
- Take 1-2 examples from the EPJA paper, e.g. pion SF and pion FF and explain implications for detectors, e.g. need detection fraction, which affects forward detector design, and need calorimetry for large-x resolution
- Show kinematics for scattered electron, e.g. momentum/angular distribution and point out ongoing work on plugins for simulation, i.e. demonstrate how the analysis chain works
- Include a timeline of meetings that took place and that are planned for the next months
- Specific comments:
- Split the neutron and Lambda final states into two slides - different detector requirements for each, KLambda is new for many people
- Beam energies: general concept is to take fixed luminosity and look what is doable at the extremes
- make clear that pi0 is not for meson SF studies but for systematic checks
- Note that for KLambda need to reconstruct the particle
- Include slide on Jupyter details in backup for reference
- Adjust crossing angle in the DEMP studies - make new plots
ACTION ITEMS
- Complete the slides for the EIC meeting and circulate
- Ask for a 5-min presentation on meson SF in the joint PWG+DWG session
- Figure out detection fraction for KLambda
- Continue work on analysis chain including KLambda
- Is there a meeting time that allows people from more time zones to participate?
NEXT MEETING: MONDAY MARCH 30 at 4:00PM (ET)
NEXT WORKING MEETING: MONDAY APRIL 13 (all day, remote meeting)