Subconvener Meeting Summary 2/3/20
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
PARTICIPANTS
- Subconveners: A. Kiselev, A. Mastroserio, D. Neyret, E. Chudakov, Y. Furletova, K. Gnanvo, L. Greiner, T. Hemmick, V. Berdnikov, W. Brooks, M. Murray, E. Aschenauer
- Conveners: K. Barish, T. Horn, P. Jones, S. dalla Torre
- SC: R. Ent
GENERAL COMMENTS
- Please use the general EICUG tools, e.g. the mailing lists, web site, calendar
- Please reach out to the R&D Consortia
- When setting up regular meetings, please invite the conveners
- For subsequent meetings, the subgroups presenting please prepare 2-3 slides documenting progress, questions, path forward, other important points
- Integration of information into Yellow Report - a template will be posted soon; for now please continue separate documentation
SUMMARY NOTES
Tracking (K. Gnanvo, L. Greiner, A. Mastroserio)
- Compiling a mailing list - planning first meeting within a week
- Planning to involve new collaborators, e.g. laboratory instrumentation groups
PID (T. Hemmick)
- Discussion material - showing the overall concept approach (benchmark process from PWG, interface with SWG, R&D performance from Consortia)
- No meetings yet with the community - planning to reach out within the next week
Calorimetry (V. Berdnikov)
- Setting up EICUG tools (google group etc) - sent out invitations to google group including R&D Consortium and additional interested people
- First meeting planned within a week
Far Forward Detectors/IR Integration (Y. Furletova, M. Murray)
- Mailing list established (>30 people already joined), documents with information what on what is in the IRs available on Indico
- First meeting on 1/27 - focus on accelerator constraints, ongoing forward detectors work
- Second meeting 2/10 will focus on integration between accelerator and Geant4
- Action item: need to understand limitations for case of two IRs, e.g. optics - check with accelerator
DAQ/Electronics (D. Neyret)
- Subconveners met and made a list of tasks for the group including front-end, trigger, DAQ - in general, the group's task will stop with step when data are on tape, i.e. not treating analysis of data
- detailed points that will be covered include: identify technologies, number of channels, electronic noise, trigger vs. trigger-less readout, what type of DAQ
- Starting to setup the group - first meeting planned within ~2 weeks
Central Detector Integration/Magnet (A. Kiselev, W. Brooks)
- Working in coordination of tasks, e.g. central solenoid field properties, fringe fields etc. (important for tracking) - contacted magnet groups from BNL and JLab that could help with that
- Envision two initial meetings: 1) with magnet designers, 2) with wider audience
- Putting detector together requires input from all groups - this information could be collected in a central database of requirements, sizes, active and passive volume
- Note: passive area definition includes supports that hold up the detectors or special requirements on beam pipe
- Coordination of effort is important - for now the group will start recording information like interferences
Complementarity (Elke)