Difference between revisions of "General Meeting Summary 1/7/20"

From cua_phy
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(8 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
* Received 9 positive responses so far - one more positive response after the meeting
 
* Received 9 positive responses so far - one more positive response after the meeting
::* some had questions for clarification, e.g. the role of the subconvener, role of the R&D Consortia, etc. - these will be addressed by email/phone or in the first meeting of Conveners+Subconveners
+
::* some questions for clarification, e.g. about the role of subconveners, connection to the R&D Consortia, etc. - these will be addressed by email/phone or in the first meeting of Conveners+Subconveners
 
::* Silvia: 2 phone calls (PID, DAQ&electronics)
 
::* Silvia: 2 phone calls (PID, DAQ&electronics)
 
::* Ken: 1 contact (far-forward detectors)
 
::* Ken: 1 contact (far-forward detectors)
  
* Send reminders to the remaining five who have not yet responded at all on 1/10
+
* 5 subgroups (out of 8) have a complete set of subconveners
 +
::* Tracking
 +
::* PID
 +
::* Calorimetry (e+h)
 +
::* Forward detector/IR integration
 +
::* Detector Complementarity
 +
 
 +
* Send reminders to the remaining subconvener candidates if no response by 1/10
 
::* Silvia: 2 emails (central detector integration, DAQ & electronics)
 
::* Silvia: 2 emails (central detector integration, DAQ & electronics)
::* Tanja: 2 emails (far-forward detectors, complementarity)
+
::* Tanja: 1 email (far-forward detectors)
 
::* Peter: 1 contact (tracking)
 
::* Peter: 1 contact (tracking)
  
Line 19: Line 26:
 
::* Information is being compiled into a list to be expanded by the subconveners
 
::* Information is being compiled into a list to be expanded by the subconveners
  
* Discussion and assignment of Conveners to respond to emails received
+
* Discussion and assignment of Conveners to respond to emails received most recently
 
::* Silvia: ANL, LBL, Saclay
 
::* Silvia: ANL, LBL, Saclay
 
::* Tanja: eRD22, BNL, SC guidance
 
::* Tanja: eRD22, BNL, SC guidance
Line 36: Line 43:
 
::* both roles are needed and important
 
::* both roles are needed and important
 
::* same person could do both
 
::* same person could do both
 
* possible requests to the software group to be presented in two upcoming meetings
 
::* Tutorials like those scheduled are the kind of support that is needed
 
::* Important to realize that not all groups may be able to align with the official software on short timescale and present results with a temporary software
 
::* Provide help with the translation of possibly new pieces of detector into the global software would be helpful
 
::* Capability and support for substantial event generation for data sets to be specified
 
  
 
* Meetings with the software group - Silvia replies to this email
 
* Meetings with the software group - Silvia replies to this email
Line 47: Line 48:
 
::* wider group: 23 January - suggest after quarterly meeting, e.g. 12pm (ET)
 
::* wider group: 23 January - suggest after quarterly meeting, e.g. 12pm (ET)
 
::::* valuable to meet with the simulation team to inform of the current status of the detector working group
 
::::* valuable to meet with the simulation team to inform of the current status of the detector working group
::::* overall philosophy and progress on organizational structur
+
::::* overall philosophy and progress on organizational structure
 +
 
 +
* Possible requests to the software group to be presented in two upcoming meetings
 +
::* Tutorials like those scheduled are the kind of support that is needed
 +
::* Important to realize that not all groups may be able to align themselves with the official software on short timescale and may present results with a temporary software
 +
::* Support with the translation of possibly new pieces of detector into the global software would be helpful
 +
::* Capability and support for substantial event generation for data sets to be specified
  
  

Latest revision as of 23:57, 7 January 2020

STATUS OF SUBCONVENER INVITATIONS

  • 15 people were invited for the subgroups (tracking, PID, calorimetry, Far-forward detectors, Central detector integration and magnet, forward detectors/IR integration, DAQ and electronics, detector complementarity)
  • Received 9 positive responses so far - one more positive response after the meeting
  • some questions for clarification, e.g. about the role of subconveners, connection to the R&D Consortia, etc. - these will be addressed by email/phone or in the first meeting of Conveners+Subconveners
  • Silvia: 2 phone calls (PID, DAQ&electronics)
  • Ken: 1 contact (far-forward detectors)
  • 5 subgroups (out of 8) have a complete set of subconveners
  • Tracking
  • PID
  • Calorimetry (e+h)
  • Forward detector/IR integration
  • Detector Complementarity
  • Send reminders to the remaining subconvener candidates if no response by 1/10
  • Silvia: 2 emails (central detector integration, DAQ & electronics)
  • Tanja: 1 email (far-forward detectors)
  • Peter: 1 contact (tracking)


LIST OF CONTRIBUTORS

  • Received email input from BNL, JLAB, Los Alamos, ANL, LBL, some of the R&D Consortia, and some university groups with contributor names and interests
  • Information is being compiled into a list to be expanded by the subconveners
  • Discussion and assignment of Conveners to respond to emails received most recently
  • Silvia: ANL, LBL, Saclay
  • Tanja: eRD22, BNL, SC guidance


WORKING GROUP WEB PAGE AND MAILING LISTS

  • Ken will follow up with Thomas on details of the mailing list requests


SOFTWARE GROUP COMMUNICATIONS

  • subconvener and ex-officio - Tanja replies to this email
  • both roles are needed and important
  • same person could do both
  • Meetings with the software group - Silvia replies to this email
  • core group: 22 January - suggest 12pm (ET)
  • wider group: 23 January - suggest after quarterly meeting, e.g. 12pm (ET)
  • valuable to meet with the simulation team to inform of the current status of the detector working group
  • overall philosophy and progress on organizational structure
  • Possible requests to the software group to be presented in two upcoming meetings
  • Tutorials like those scheduled are the kind of support that is needed
  • Important to realize that not all groups may be able to align themselves with the official software on short timescale and may present results with a temporary software
  • Support with the translation of possibly new pieces of detector into the global software would be helpful
  • Capability and support for substantial event generation for data sets to be specified


NEXT MEETINGS:

  • MEETING WITH SUBCONVENERS MONDAY 13 JANUARY AT 12PM (ET)
  • DETECTOR WG MEETING TUESDAY 14 JANUARY AT 12PM (ET) AS NEEDED